|
INDEX
Part
1: 'do you think I would expose my life and
that of my family to danger just to save a
rapist?
A maniac?'
Part
2: 'was the star witness' word enough?'
Part 3:
'why only one voter's I.D. when two girls
were missing?'
Part
4: 'prosecutorial misconduct?'
Part
5: 'the logbook, if it ain't broken, why fix
it?'
Part
6: 'why two girls continued talking to two guys
they despised - for two hours?'
Part
7: 'how many were actually police assets?'
Part
8: 'NBI barred from case, director barred from
testifying, and prosecutors promised instant
promotions?'
Part
9: 'could have thrown witnesses'
testimonies out of court'
|
|
Part
10: 'the mysterious computer diskette?'
Part
11: 'the dead body in Carcar, who was
she?'
Part
12: 'three different groups of people,
unknown to each other, bundled up
for an alleged crime on two sisters
they never met or heard of?'
Part
13: 'did the Chiongs had to lie in court
just to convict all seven accused?'
Part
14: 'pictures should paint a thousand
words'
Part
15: 'paco's airtight alibi'
Part
16: 'After seeing Paco 4 times, who is
he?'
Part
17: 'felt like eating barbecue at 1:30 in
the morning'
Part
18: 'judge not convince of guilt of
Chiong
convicts'
Part
19: 'arrest now, produce evidence later'
Part 20: 'convict now, never mind the
defense
evidence'
Conclusion:
'should we continue to be sitting
ducks'
|